In recent years, the substantial growth of the value of the humanities has sparked a controversy over its potential impact. It can be agreed that the study of the humanities is necessary in today's changing world, but it is also accepted that preparing for specific wealth-producing careers is necessary. I am inclined to believe in the first statement. This essay will discuss the aforementioned topic before giving an appropriate conclusion.
Admittedly, there could be numerous reasons why people need to study humanities in today's changing world but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that humanity study supports humans to live a better life and nourish their mental health. For example, international studies have repeatedly shown that 80% of students graduating from the faculty of humanity at the National University of Singapore have a happier life than others. Due to this reason, there is a little doubt that there are many people, including myself, would agree with the above statement.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that specific wealth-producing careers such as pharmacist are a better option. This is essentially rooted in the fact that material life has been dominated in the way humans feel about other people. For instance, from my experience, chemists earn twice more than people having humanity career. Therefore, taking into account the above argument, it is understandable to have some people go along with this viewpoint.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, it is obvious to conclude that the long term benefits of the study of the humanities will definitely outweigh its drawbacks. While some people may be concerned about its negative effects, it is important to take the necessary steps and come up with feasible solutions to address its issues as early as possible.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: dhavalpatel095
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24496644295 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91716526096 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593959731544 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1004907321 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.230769231 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.086844681953 0.242375264174 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304202144137 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270637584831 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0561092746167 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337192266857 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.