Sportsmen have been the role models for people, especially for youngsters, since ages. These sports persons sometimes cannot maintain their calm in nail-biting games or in personal life; speaking of which is ignored by their crazy fans as long performance is top notch. It is disagreed that athlete's misbehavior should not be considered over their fine performance. Analyzing the impact of popular athlete's wrong behavior and consequences of thier involvement in any illicit act will show this.
Firstly, most of the young crowd admire athletes and simply follow what these athletes do, which can go south if sports person gets involved in illegal activity. For example, basket ball champion Kevin Nash was caught in drug abuse by narcotics department in 2019; and in the same year, convicts under the same charge were increased significantly. Unfortunately, such foul behavior sets a wrong example which can affect the society negatively. Thus, this makes it clear why any misconduct from professional athletes cannot be supported whether it is on field or off field.
Secondly, numerous local and international brands endorse prominent sport figures to boost their business and in return, companies provide fund to individual players or to the team. Needless to say, when an athlete does any kind of misbehavior, it can tarnish the reputation and affect the sales of the brand that athlete represents. For instance, after Carl Perry was found guilty in the match fixing, Samsung discontinued the contract with him, resulting nobody sponsored him and his participation in Olympics 2016. Such misbehavior could cost not only an individual, but also the state or the nation that athlete represents. From this, it becomes quite evident that wrong behavior from professional athletes cannot be accorded.
In summary, a sportsman represents his state, nation and multiple brands associated with him; not only that, their followers also follow his path. Hence, it is clear why any wrongful behavior from professional sportsmen cannot be supported, whether it is related to his game or personal life, regardless his extra ordinary performance.
- It is observed that communication between family members in today s time is less as compared to the past However some people do not think so Do you agree or disagree 93
- Many people believe that criminals should be imprisoned others however say they should do unpaid work that is beneficial for the community Discuss both view and your opinion 78
- Some people believe that teachers have an important role to play in the educational success while others think that it is the students attitude that matters Discuss both views and share your opinion 86
- Nowadays many business meetings and trainings are happening online and not in real offices Do you think advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages in this matter 89
- Some people believe that wild birds or animals should be forced out of the city while others think they should be kept in the city Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: top-notch
...their crazy fans as long performance is top notch. It is disagreed that athletes misbehav...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'athletes'' or 'athlete's'?
Suggestion: athletes'; athlete's
...ance is top notch. It is disagreed that athletes misbehavior should not be considered ov...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'narcotics'' or 'narcotic's'?
Suggestion: narcotics'; narcotic's
... Kevin Nash was caught in drug abuse by narcotics department in 2019; and in the same yea...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in summary, kind of, speaking of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38988095238 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81727988887 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633928571429 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3807030657 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.733333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112515907859 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038747439071 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394421382424 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692552467729 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248342034456 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: top-notch
...their crazy fans as long performance is top notch. It is disagreed that athletes misbehav...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'athletes'' or 'athlete's'?
Suggestion: athletes'; athlete's
...ance is top notch. It is disagreed that athletes misbehavior should not be considered ov...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'narcotics'' or 'narcotic's'?
Suggestion: narcotics'; narcotic's
... Kevin Nash was caught in drug abuse by narcotics department in 2019; and in the same yea...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in summary, kind of, speaking of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38988095238 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81727988887 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633928571429 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3807030657 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.733333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112515907859 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038747439071 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394421382424 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692552467729 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248342034456 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.