TPO50- all university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Education has always had paramount importance in people's life because it is considered as the basis of success in future life. In this regard, the course materials in universities are the most significant issue. Some people believe that all university students should be required to take history classes, independent of their basic major. Personally, I disagree with this group. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, studying history for the students with non-history majors only fill their mind with unusable materials. To explain more, any individual's memory has a limited capacity, in which he/she can only remember some restricted matters. Therefore, filling the brain with some materials that are not directly related to the students can merely tighten the space of the mind for other advantageous things. On one hand, not being in favor of history, students may get tired, and on the other hand, they get distracted and lose concentration on the principal studying materials. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Many years ago, when I was attending school, I had a physics teacher. He believed that people must not memorize everything because the grey cells of any individual's brain are limited. Even he did not memorize the phone number, and just had a phone notebook, which had written all of his required number in it.
Secondly, studying non-required history can waste the students' time. To be more specific, dedicating time to the class, studying, doing projects, and being prepared for the final exam is not really needed. Instead, they can allocate this specific time to their most important classes and projects, which helping them to achieve prosperity in the future. For instance, passing a course successfully in the educational season needs at least three hours of working each day. Suppose someone has some non-required course in his term, so he had to dedicate approximately 270 hours to that. He can use this time for something more helpful in his life. If he does not allocate his time to the history course, he will have more time to do something advantageous in his life.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the history course should not be required for all of the students. This is because this not only can make their brain busy but also wastes their valuable time.
- TPO28 Integrated Task 70
- TPo54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- TPO 48 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 76
- Some parent offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- TPO27 Integrated Task 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...nusable materials. To explain more, any individuals memory has a limited capacity, in which...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...story course should not be required for all of the students. This is because this not only...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, at least, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01772151899 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6988030485 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53417721519 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4045271382 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0909090909 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9545454545 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231347475358 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726318737366 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101557221503 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170426801378 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549278595423 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.