The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the amount of three sorts of spreads (butter, margarine and low fat and reduced spreads) in grams which were consumed over 26 years from 1981 to 2007.
Overall, the consumption of butter and margarine decreased over the period given, while low fat and reduced spreads, it rose. The butter became most popular spread in initial year that was replaced by margarine, following low fat and reduced spreads occupied its position.
With regards to amount of butter was eaten, at began, about 140 grams accounted for its consumption, peaked at 160 grams in 1980 before falling dramatically to 160 grams in final year. Likewise, the consumption of margarine stood at 90 grams in initial year which showed slight fluctuations over the entire period and a low of 40 grams in 2007.
However,the low fat and reduced spreads were taken as a food stuff just over 20 grams in 1996, this figure showed a significant rise of 70 grams in later 5 years, fell significantly to 40 grams in 2007.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , margarine
... amount of three sorts of spreads butter,margarine and low fat and reduced spreads in gram...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and reduced spreads in grams which were consumed over 26 years from 1981 to 2007...
^^
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...given, while low fat and reduced spreads,it rose. The butter became most popular sp...
^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...and a low of 40 grams in 2007. However,the low fat and reduced spreads were taken ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , fell
...ficant rise of 70 grams in later 5 years,fell significantly to 40 grams in 2007.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91715976331 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76242018932 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562130177515 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.28119635 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 138.5 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115411149515 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704156619977 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612283085004 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881703324138 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621637631126 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.