The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph depicts the data for waste production in tonnes by three different companies from the year 2000 to 2015.
Overall, it is conspicuous that at the start of the period maximum waste was produced by the company A. However, at the end of the period company C was the highest producer of waste.
It is clear from the graph that company A registered the decreasing trend over the period. In the year 2000, company A produced 12 tonnes of waste which then decreased significantly to almost 8 tonnes in the year 2015. Similarly, company B also faced reduction in waste production but grew from 2000 to 2005. Production of waste by company B rose from around 8 tonnes in 2000 to almost 10 tonnes in 2005, then it reduced drastically to 3 tonnes in the year 2015.
On the other hand, company C followed the upward fashion throughout the period. There was production of 4 tonnes of waste by company C and then it achieved the highest and attained 10 tonnes in the year 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Phuong1810 | 70 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Phuong1810 | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | dorae | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 56
- With all the problems in the world today spending money on space exploration is a complete waste The money could be better spent on other causes To what extent do you agree with this view 73
- Internet is generally considered as a blessing for mankind Do the advantages of it outweigh its disadvantages 59
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57865168539 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54452212693 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460674157303 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7790233867 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.5555555556 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215585798293 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11855261184 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381349484933 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151747659154 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176926735951 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.