The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates how much waste was generated by three organizations from 2000 to 2015.
It is evident that apart from Company C, the other two companies witnessed a minor fluctuation in waste production in 2015, with an overall downward trend observed across all the companies. Additionally, Company C experienced the most significant increase in waste production compared to the other companies.
In 2000, Company A had the highest amount of waste produced among the three organizations, reporting just 12 tons. However, this figure gradually declined to reach a value of 9 tons in 2010. Subsequently, over the next five years, Company A made further slight reductions in its waste output and concluded at a final quantity of 8 tons in 2015. Meanwhile, Company B commenced with a waste production level below 9 tons in 2000. Therefore, it saw a slight increase to around 10 tons by 2005. Moreover, there was a substantial drop in waste production for Company B as it reached an impressive low of only 3 tons by the end of the period.
In contrast to Companies A and B, which generally diminished their waste generation levels during this time frame, Company C displayed an upward trajectory. At the beginning of the period under analysis, this company produced approximately 4 tons of waste, which rose steadily to about 6 tons by 2005. Importantly, it should be noted that after this point, an exponential increase occurred in Company C's waste production; it went on to surpass even its counterparts' levels and hit just above 9 tons by the conclusion of the presented data set.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Phuong1810 | 70 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Phuong1810 | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | dorae | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
- The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 73
- Task 2 Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any rel 71
- The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, therefore, while, apart from, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97003745318 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0064013587 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 106.607317073 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591760299625 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0311692248 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.583333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179367470268 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748676018175 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520039745313 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105572415252 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412854768558 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.