Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the current modern society, Internet plays an increasingly important role and all governments have to present suitable Internet connection throughout their country. Some people feel that Internet access should be free, while others hold the opposite view. I, personally, believe that all governments should provide their people with free Internet. The reasons why I feel this way are explored in the following essay.
To begin with, having free Internet access leads to a reduction in air pollution. In recent years the Internet has changed the way people used to do many tasks. Hence, as long as people have free access to the Internet, they are encouraged to use online services such as e-shopping instead of driving their own cars in the city. So, free Internet results in fewer cars and a healthier environment. For example, last week, I read an article in a major newspaper about how Internet affects environment. According to that article, the countries in which Internet costs less have about 30 % less air pollution issues than those without.
Moreover, offering free Internet means providing many opportunities for people in a society to acquire knowledge. As we all know, nowadays tons of online books and articles can be found online at no cost. Hence, when people have free Internet, they are more eager to download these resources and start reading them, an option which seems not so desirable when they have to pay for Internet. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a freshman student, I lived in campus dormitory, where the students were provided free and unlimited Internet access. During that year, my main pastime activity was to surf the web and download any books or article that seemed interesting. As a result, I read so many books that year. In contrast, the next year, I did not read so many books, because I had rented an apartment off campus, and I had to pay my own Internet bill. This example clearly demonstrates how free Internet can motivates people to acquire knowledge.
Admittedly, free Internet would cost lots of money for the government. They should assign a considerable amount of their budgets for Internet. However, I believe that governments can impose tax put a direct tax for companies which are publishing their advertisements on the Internet. This way, the financial concern of the governments will be solved.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that in order to reduce air pollution and increase the people’s knowledge, the governments should offer free Internet to their citizens, even if this is of the cost of coming up with new ideas to solve its financial burden.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 76 | view |
2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 80 | view |
2023-04-22 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
- TPO 59 integrated 80
- Are people today more willing to help strangers 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples 68
- TPO 45 80
- It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 938, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'motivate'
Suggestion: motivate
...arly demonstrates how free Internet can motivates people to acquire knowledge. Admitte...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04318181818 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73132428544 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531818181818 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7365366024 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4583333333 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320094607315 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986124196013 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570892808014 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194810984868 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604665778294 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.