Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters.
Do you agree or disagree?
Natural disasters are sometimes unpredictable and can cause serious difficulties anywhere that might not be easy for some nations to deal with. I agree that rich countries ought to provide humanitarian support to poorer nations because they may not have the required resources to fix the problems by themselves and it would stronger the relations of the countries.
Under-developed countries are not economically strong enough to support their people in case of natural disasters such as earthquakes and floods. It gets challenging for poorer nations to provide help to everyone and everywhere that as a result troubles many individuals and families. Wealthy countries should make themselves available to help such countries and their people as a sign of humanity. Their contribution might save many lives and help the countries to cope with the consequences effectively. For example, Bangladesh, which is the poorest country in the world, received $10 million as a help from America when the nation was hit by a massive earthquake in 2001.
Helping the under-developed countries in severe consequences would result in stronger relations between the nations. People would praise the assistance provided by the rich countries in their bad times that will strengthen the bonds of the countries. As a result, every country would help one another and would be able to grow together eventually. For instance, India delivered 10 million doses of medicines to US in the times of coronavirus outbreak that resulted in close relations between these two countries deciding to help each other to fight with any complexity.
In conclusion, rich countries should provide the required assistance with humanitarian relief to the countries that cannot handle the situations caused by natural disasters. Countries must make themselves available which is a kind gesture of humanity and it will also help deepen the relations of the countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-24 | Nailesita | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Nailesita | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-03 | Premlatha KR | 55 | view |
| 2021-02-16 | Ankita91Sh | 56 | view |
| 2021-02-08 | orphism | 73 | view |
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters Do you agree or disagree 73
- More and more measures to improve the security in large urban areas have been introduced in many countries because of the increased crime Do the benefits of these measures outweigh the drawbacks 85
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well Others say that teachers should only teach academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and uses up the world s fuel resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and uses up the world s fuel resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39735099338 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01067498287 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513245033113 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8628793561 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.384615385 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266873986219 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100273461127 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723331457392 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179279920354 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599451014767 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.