Some people argue that language barrier is one the biggest challenge that people living abroad have to deal with. While I agree that this could lead to some serious social problems in many countries but in recent years with the development of technology, these issues have become less serious.
On the one hand, the main reason that having to speak a foreign language can cause social problems is misunderstanding between people in different cultures. As a prevalent example in my country, my grandparents lived in Viet Nam 50 years ago had to migrate to England to protect themselves because of the war with other countries. He once noticed that it is very difficult to get a job and integrate with a new society when he did not know just a little about English.
However, nowadays, technology has played an important role in the decrease of language barrier among people all around the world. For instance, almost people who know about technology have a smartphone with Google map to find the direction and location rather than asking locals. Additionally, leading corporations are also developing AI translator which could help users to understand other language immediately. Doing a grocery or buying food from a menu written in foreign languages is no longer an issue and thanks to these developments.
In conclusion, I approve the notion that not knowing the local language when you live in another country is sometimes troublesome, bit it could be solve a part with technology
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 73
- Task 1 The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02024291498 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81047487697 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.663967611336 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.782791373 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263949335323 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963350207226 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10466904626 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150918705169 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583978975929 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.