Some children have a natural ability to grasp foreign languages and for that reason, it should not be a mandatory subject in the academic curriculum. Do you agree or Disagree?
The opinion is divided into whether learning a non-indigenous language should not be compulsory in the school curriculum since some pupils are predisposed to learning different languages or not is heated abate among individuals. I favor placing the latter approach in schools' educational programs as a mandatory subject because of the enormous benefit of learning multiple languages at an early age.
It is common knowledge that it is much easier to learn a second language at an early age; young children are not confused by introducing multiple languages simultaneously. Not only they naturally navigate multilingual environments. The expert argues that acquiring a second language early in life primes the brain to learn other languages. Also, the communication skills that children learn early in life will be the foundation for their communication abilities and provide them additional job security and advancement opportunities in uncertain economic times; vital language skill is an asset that will promote a lifetime of effective communications. For instance, a doctor who can communicate with his or her patient in their native language is much more likely to diagnose them.
Additionally, communication in multiple languages is becoming critical in the increasingly integrated global business community. To prepare our nation's children to be the next generation of future entrepreneurs, doctors, scientists, or whatever influential job they choose, we must foster an environment from a young age that promotes multilingual learning. Through this, we are setting up ourselves and our children for growth, success, security, and, ultimately, prosperity.
The other reason is the cognitive benefits of learning a new language, which directly impacts children's academic achievement, compared to those without an additional language. Bilingual children learn faster and more comfortably, have improved problem-solving skills and creativity. They also find it easier to connect with other cultures, which make them more open-minded and tolerant of diversity, also show signs of enhanced creativity and mental flexibility; the result of a study which accomplished at Gail university indicated that the bilingual individuals are less likely to experiences age-related mental illness (such as dementia) as they reach old age.
Overall, it appears that putting non-indigenous language as a mandatory subject in school will variously help children. Therefore, it is up to us to create a warm and comfortable environment in which children can grow to learn languages' complexities.
- governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You should write at least 250 wor 67
- Some children have a natural ability to grasp foreign languages and for that reason it should not be a mandatory subject in the academic curriculum Do you agree or Disagree 89
- Please tell me How can I upload picture and give your suggestions in my essay.The following pie charts and the table show how three countries (USA, UK and Malaysia) deal with dangerous waste. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the informa 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- Some children have a natural ability to grasp foreign languages and for that reason it should not be a mandatory subject in the academic curriculum Do you agree or Disagree 42
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, therefore, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7265625 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2805296415 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.02183991 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.6 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207627911366 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702562236664 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037889771931 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113786471264 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375968250956 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.