Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Whether the affluent societies should provide aid for the needy in the underdeveloped countries or the governments of poor countries are supposed to undertake the responsibility of their inhabitants’ wellbeing themselves is the main issue. In this essay, I will discuss why I am a proponent of the idea that the governments themselves are liable for providing standard living conditions for their people.
Firstly, in any society, the ruling party is responsible for providing an appropriate condition for residents. It means that all essential requirements of all residents are supposed to be satisfied by the government. If such dire needs are not met, the central government is not qualified to govern the country anymore, and its authorities are obliged to resign or being prosecuted in the trial. This is because the life of population would be endangered in case that the inhabitants cannot have access to their basic needs such as food, shelter, medicine, and education. As a case in point, in Venezuela, the country in which people grapple with economic recession to find food, leader of government whose responsibility was taking care of its citizens against poverty, was subjected to the prosecution.
Secondly, governments should not depend on international humanitarian activities because these activities have a temporary positive effect on the life of destitute individuals. It means that the demerits of it overweigh its merits in the long run. The residents of undeveloped countries living in the abject poverty probably hold this misconception that these foreign financial and non-financial aids will be a permanent source of supporting their life. So, most of them are likely to lose their motivation to work hard, the result of which is the widespread indolence among the labor force and lead to reducing work efficiency in the country receiving the international financial aid.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36789297659 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16324316394 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56856187291 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.7593351494 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.909090909 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193180524583 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068346117342 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036600979276 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131225888051 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386328052324 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.