What are the merits and the demerits of wearing a uniform at school?
It is crystal clear that schools and students are extremely important entities in a society, which construct the future of society. Therefore, their problems and issues should be critical enough to be considered by authorities. One of the heated controversies about schools is whether it is better for students to wear a uniform in schools. This subject has its proponents and detractors having their own reasons and inferences. To conclude which group makes valid points, the merits and the demerits of wearing a uniform in schools are discussed hereunder.
One of its great advantages is equality. Every student from any social class wears the same clothes. Therefore, neither is there any discrimination against students on the basis of their parents’ financial status, nor their performance in their lessons is evaluated on the ground of every criterion other than their effort and intelligence. However, in my viewpoint, there is at least one school in any city district, particularly in developed countries in today's world; hence, students and their families enjoy virtually the same financial status. Another plus point about wearing a uniform in schools is that students of a certain school can be distinguished from those of other schools. This concept is vital when students have an accident, and people want to inform their parents or whoever knows them. As far as I am concerned, broadly, in the present-day world, students have a mobile phone, including their parents’ phone numbers and addresses.
The major drawback of wearing a uniform in schools is that it is an obligatory action. It is generally accepted that a mandatory action has more detrimental effects than beneficial ones. This compulsory action is so severe as to restrict students’ freedom. It is likely that there are a few students detesting the uniform of their schools. In addition, if students of a school wear the same clothes, the school’s environment will not colorful and vibrant, and it will look like a communist country which has illustrated their inefficiency throughout history. For these reasons, this obligatory action can adversely affect students’ spirits so severely that a few students who can be prosperous, influential persons sometime in the future hate education and are inclined to leave it.
To summarize, by taking the above-mentioned facts and reasons into account, I strongly subscribe to the view that the downside of wearing a uniform in schools outweigh its benefits. In the end, I do believe that if the authority in regions in which wearing a uniform is necessary for schools rescinded this rule, students’ performance would improve.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-03 | theprasad | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-28 | prakriti malla | 85 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | prakriti malla | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | joyce05 | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A person should never make an important decision alone 76
- Too much education is dangerous If people receive more education than they need to function in their job it only breeds dissatisfaction To what extend do you agree with this 64
- What are the merits and the demerits of wearing a uniform at school 83
- A gift can contribute to child s development What gift would you give to help a child development 76
- Some people prefer to get up early in the morning and start the day s work Others prefer to get up later in the day and work late until late at night Which do you prefer 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, as to, at least, in addition, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2243.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29009433962 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94683274079 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1024298958 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.15 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252851508769 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882980303575 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104026552693 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177712197765 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615844255734 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.