In any profession — business, politics, education, government — those in
power should step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
I don’t fully agree with the agreement. Some people might argue that when those in power stay in their positions for several decades, even until they die, they may become corrupted, reluctant to change, or even incapable of leading the whole organization. However, while this argument may be true in most professions, in some circumstances, such as education and business, where experience plays a major role, stepping down after five years will not be good. Also, a change of leader every five years may cause the one in power reluctant to prepare for the long-term future. Instead, he will be prone to make policies that have short-term effects but may be inimical to long-term development.
Albert Einstein, one of the most prodigious scientists of all time, is a good example. While he was considered reluctant to change and unable to adopt new physical ideas by young scientists, they still view him with high regard. Not only because he came up with the theory of relativity a long time ago, but also because his profound understanding of nature is still useful.
Take Warren Buffet, for example. He had led his company for many decades and is still leading his company. His experience will only be more valuable over time. If he steps down after five years, the successor will likely change his previous investment in the stock market. These changes might lead to unnecessary perturbations, since in the business world, focusing on long-term trends is far more important than focusing on a short-term fad.
On the other hand, changing the one at power every five years is sensible in politics. Governments take control of the whole country. They have the right to change the law, declare war, etc. that can significantly influence the life of every national, sometimes even the whole world. Thus, to ensure the precise use of this mortal power, an election is necessary. This might bring about some detrimental effects as changing leaders in an enterprise, but this is a necessary evil.
The tradition of the emperor has existed in China for thousands of years. When an emperor cares about the people, the whole country will prosper. Nonetheless, when the one in power is a deposit, it might lead to the starvation of millions of people and the corruption of the whole government.
Those in power should step down after five years might be a good practice in some professions, such as politics. However, it is not an appropriate system in other areas, such as business. There should be some flexibility in the stepping down system to take different circumstances into account.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
| 2022-05-13 | Skittle_Mix07 | 70 | view |
| 2022-03-12 | Siam | 66 | view |
| 2021-12-16 | Sunita086 | 50 | view |
| 2021-10-19 | bomavo | 83 | view |
- Strategic advertising is vital for businesses who want to get their names out to customers along with information about their products and services One of the strongest advantages of radio over TV is that the commercial spots can be better targeted to cus 85
- Describe a food that is important to your country s sense of identity Explain how this food contributes to your country s food culture Use specific examples and details to support your answer 3
- Strategic advertising is vital for businesses who want to get their names out to customers along with information about their products and services One of the strongest advantages of radio over TV is that the commercial spots can be better targeted to cus 81
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 66
- The government has announced that it plans to build a new multilane highway near where you live Compare the advantages and disadvantages of living near this project What is your view of this project Give details to support your opinion 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, thus, while, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9930875576 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71698069835 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529953917051 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5972359695 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.68 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.36 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153861657902 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435134226579 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562988864278 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797079528533 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645558634716 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.