The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Given is the line graph illustrating changes in the number of diarrhea cases in Mashhad in a decade, from 1983 to 1992.
Overall, there was mainly a trend of increase in the number of patients with diarrhea, except for 2 times of significant decrease in 1988 and 1992. Most noticeably, at the end of this 10-year period, there were no cases of this disease anymore.
Looking at the information more closely, 100 diarrhea cases were recorded in 1983, then it rose doubly to 200 cases in 1987. After that, a remarkable reduction was witnessed in 1988, where the number of people having diarrhea felt back to the same level as it was in 1983.
However, there was a quadruple surge in the number of patients with diarrhea the year after, reaching a peak of 400 cases in 1989. One year after that, the number of cases of diarrhea slightly declined by 50 cases and remained unchanged in 2 years, 1990 and 1991. In 1992, the attempt of stopping the diarrhea disease in Mashhad was tremendously successful, with 0 cases reported in the community.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, then, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69398907104 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56179852243 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 15.3541525328 43.030603864 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277883752262 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128950633012 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634088609421 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180504873838 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543854524751 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.