The given charts detail the statistical report comparing the number of individuals(per thousands) who pursued in the field of science and education from the developed and developing countries over a period of 10 years from 1980 to 1990.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, the industrialized countries outweigh the developed ones with regard to career and research in science and education.
According to the given illustration, individuals in the industrialized countries spent nearly 9 years of schooling, which was nearly 3 times more than the developed countries. Also, whilst more than 40 in every 1000 people opted to be scientists and technicians, the same was just close to a quarter in the developing countries. Furthermore, only $50 billion was invested by the developing countries on research, whereas the amount trebled in the developed nations.
After a decade, besides a significant increase in both the nations, a plunge in spendings was witnessed in the developing nations, just $5 billion compared to $350 billion in the developed nations. Moreover, While the average schooling years in the developed nations crossed 10 years period with more than 60 individuals as scientists, just one-third of that was reported in the developing nations.
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 11
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 78
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 84
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 84
- The graph below shows the information about languages 13 year old students in one school choose to study 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itnessed in the developing nations, just billion compared to 50 billion in the de...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, third, whereas, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3932038835 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10955960225 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533980582524 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.9680963411 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.714285714 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4285714286 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7142857143 5.23603664747 243% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211549605961 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106936111378 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699644731478 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145091092583 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682875727766 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.