The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999
The given table details the statistical report highlighting the proportional rate of the people from 6 different groups who were residing under poverty in Australia in the year 1999.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the majority of the people under the impoverished conditions were the sole parent, followed next by the single parent with no children. In contrast, aged people constituted the least proportion for the same.
According to the given illustration, of the total 1,837,000 households under poverty(11% of the total population), the sole parents accounted for the highest percentage(21%). Also, about 19% (359 000) were reported as a single parent with no children, whereas nearly 7% fewer of that was a couple with children.
Furthermore, whilst 1 57 000 more couples with no children fell under the poverty rate as against only 57000 single aged people, merely 48 000 came out to be as aged people who fell at the lowest rank in the chart.
- The diagram below shows the water supply in Australia at present and in the future 78
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 77
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 84
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections in 2050 87
- The chart below shows the amount of money per person per week spent on fast foods mainly on three income groups in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods from 1970 to 1990 Write a report for a university lecturer describing th 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of that was a couple with children. Furthermore, whilst 1 57 000 more couple...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12345679012 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84125013541 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617283950617 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8783179877 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0937726572706 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569571013579 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929098924737 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780324707245 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105359581704 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.