A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The question of animal exploitation has always been debatable in all the societies. Although, some individuals think that such practice provides people with various opportunities as medical research and fulfill their needs, I believe that animals should be treated fairly by mankind and have the same rights.
On the one hand, some people claim that mankind needs animals as they satisfy various needs. Firstly, they argue that animals are used in scientific researches for the sake of humanity. It means that tons of medical drugs are being tested on mice or other small animals before they are tested on humans and go on sale. Thus, such experiments help save a lot of human lives. Moreover, it is obvious that people need food for a stable existence. Most of the food that we consume is produced with the help of domestic animals such cows, pigs, chicken, etc. Therefore, without these animals there would be an issue about the lack of food supplies and starvation for mankind.
On the other hand, I am more inclined to the opposite point of view. First of all, it has been proven that people can exist without products of animal origin. It means that humans can obtain all vital vitamins and nutrients from vegetables and fruits. Moreover, modern market is teeming with products of vegetable production. For instance, the company "Beyond meat» produces plant-based meat substitutes that are as nutritious and tasty as the usual meat. Besides, many cosmetic companies exploit animals for the manufacture of makeup. It has been captured several times that animals, used in such laboratories, suffer in cages. Thereby, using animals to produce cosmetics is not decent as these are not vital goods.
To conclude, though a huge number of people consider animal exploitation to be necessary as it helps satisfy various needs, I believe that this is inhumane and animals deserve respect and care.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-19 | mytinh | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-18 | snowacealex | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | Alexspector | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | Lê Nguyễn Hạnh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | bapcai | 73 | view |
- Many people think that having more money will make them happier How important is money to happiness 78
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world However people are being encouraged to use alternative energy sources such as wind energy solar energy and so on Why people become more enthusiastic about this Is it a positive or negative develo 73
- Fossil fuels are essential for producing electricity powering industry and fueling transportation However one day we will reach a point when all the world s fossil fuels have been depleted How can we conserve these resources What are some alternatives to 42
- Some people believe that the government should ban smoking in all public areas while others say that it will restrict basic freedoms Do you agree or disagree 73
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to respect'
Suggestion: to respect
...at this is inhumane and animals deserve respect and care.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1054313099 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56285000438 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578274760383 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4069424202 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7777777778 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3888888889 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408649443894 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112043519408 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763203350426 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241842534974 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074662708719 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.