When new towns are planned, it is important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has long been a controversy whether we need more parks and sports centers or shopping malls in our cities. To me, I tend to vote for the former two facilities when considering their comprehensive benefits to the public health.
Superficially, it is department stores that might be attractive to some people, especially the younger generation. To them, more shopping centers means increasing convenience, which not just provides a wider variety of commodities but also saves them much time in searching for different products. This is particularly important to those busy working adults in a fast-paced modern life. Apart from urban dwellers, shopping centers are usually reckoned as a tourism attraction for travelers, especially for those from developing countries. A convincing example is those super shopping malls in Paris and New York which absorb millions of dollars to the local tourism every year.
However, I would say that it is the parks and sports facilities that deserve more priority in development of new towns. While shopping centers are more like a paradise for youngsters, it is the public parks that is suitable for people of all ages and various interests to spend leisure time, from jogging to fishing, camping to painting. It provides a precious opportunity for each individual living in concrete jungles to relieve themselves in nature, which is beneficial to their mental health
Also, more sports facilities will make it easy for people to do more exercise, which in turn will increases the physical fitness of the public, thus simulating an active lifestyle for those who are collapsing in front of computers.
To sum up, attractive though shopping centers are, I would reiterate that it is public parks and athletic facilities that is conducive to the health of the masses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-22 | Sarah Tran | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-22 | Sarah Tran | 61 | view |
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals because individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- When new towns are planned it is important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- It is important for all towns and cities to have large public outdoor places like squares and parks To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- When new towns are planned it is important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- When new towns are planned it is important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 611, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...per shopping malls in Paris and New York which absorb millions of dollars to the ...
^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich is beneficial to their mental health Also, more sports facilities will make i...
^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...to do more exercise, which in turn will increases the physical fitness of the public, thu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, well, while, apart from, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19178082192 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85380639171 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585616438356 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.2240663794 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.818181818 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248017667767 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978349958271 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594524140632 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152225849044 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376931891305 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.