The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are
dealt with in three countries.
The given pie-charts detail the proportional figure of different waste disposal practices followed in the Republic of Korea, Sweden, and The United Kingdom.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that similar procedures are followed by the Republic of Korea, and Sweden under different proportions as compared to the United Kingdom, who uses a slightly different approach for the same.
According to the given illustration, to begin with, nearly 7 out of 10 waste products are recycled in the Republic of Korea, while only one-fourth of the total waste follows recycling in Sweden. Moving on, over half of the waste in Sweden is dug under the ground as against just 22% in the Republic of Korea. Further, the least liked approach in both countries is incineration, with 20% in Sweden, and just 9% in the Republic of Korea.
By contrast, about four-fifth of the total waste goes into the ground in the United Kingdom. Furthermore, whilst the chemical treatment and dumping at sea accounts for 8% each, merely 2% of the entire waste undergoes incineration.
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 84
- The graph shows the Underground Station passenger numbers in London 78
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- The line graph shows the number of newly graduated students in the UK while the bar chart compares their proportions in five different jobs occupied by them in 1992 1997 and 2002 82
- The graph below shows the information about languages 13 year old students in one school choose to study 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23163841808 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80641436163 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8622592545 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.285714286 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133166405816 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066692266906 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446313238045 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784200775733 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053442875142 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.