It is more important to invest in renewable energy, rather than wasting money on non-renewable energy. What is your opinion?
It is true that in today’s world renewable energy is very important. While some people say that nonrenewable energy is natural resource that’s why people should invest on related projects. I support the idea of working on renewable projects.
On the one hand, there are clear arguments that human can get renewable energy from sun, wind, which are free gifts of nature. This means that all this elements will never run out. It depends on the weather and the atmosphere. For example: human can get power from sunlight which is used as electricity in solar panel. The more sunlight, the more power solar panels get.
Another reason can be that, this renewable energy does not have any negative impact on the environment. It is also environment friendly. People can use this energy whenever and where ever they want. It does not produce any gas which have negative impact on environment.
It is also very cost effective. It requires only solar panel and batteries to run. It takes power from god gifted nature. In many cold countries they use it to grow foods. It gives heat to foods and trees when needed.
On the other hand, non-renewable energy like coal, petroleum and natural gas is very limited. Firstly, it requires a lot of money to extract this. Secondly, once this are extracted it cannot be refilled. Furthermore, all this are required to burn which produces carbon-di-oxide. If carbon-di-oxide is produced it destroys ozone layer which as a result cause greenhouse effect.
In conclusion, it would be wise to invest on renewable energy projects, as it gives long term advantage. However, investing on nonrenewable energy is nothing but waste of money and energy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-30 | tahmeed1993 | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows information about Heart Attacks by Age and Gender in USA. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.The frequency of heart attacks in the US.MenWomenThousands29-4445-6 56
- Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things What is your opinion 88
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. 56
- Film stars and music celebrities may earn a great deal of money and live in luxurious surroundings but many of them lead unhappy lives Do you agree To what extent is this the price they pay for being famous 56
- People today are selfish and greedy. They think only about improving their own lives rather than others in the society. Do you agree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ee gifts of nature. This means that all this elements will never run out. It depends...
^^^^
Line 4, column 32, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nment. It is also very cost effective. It requires only solar panel and batteries...
^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... only solar panel and batteries to run. It takes power from god gifted nature. In ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98932384342 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70770568286 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572953736655 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.2975951904 54% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9842739696 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 58.4166666667 106.682146367 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.7083333333 20.7667163134 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253708636182 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066396540837 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841862106855 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140692384738 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10200715224 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.0946893788 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 50.2224549098 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.48 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.1190380762 63% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.