The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The arguer claims that instilling in the young a sense of coorperation rather than competition is the best way for a society to prapare its next generation for leadership in govenerment, industry or other fields. Although there are several flaws in this conclusion, I tend to agree with this argument.
Firstly, the opponents might argue that the cooperation could mitigate the enterprising of the young, then trigger to less strength compared with their competitors. However, the cooperation does not equal to depending on others in the team, since in a particular task, everyone has responsibility to give solution under quantified standards, thus we also improve our abilities when comparing with our teammates and learning from them. For instance, if we need to write a marketing launching plan for a new product, some people would be a good leader to provide the framework and orientation, while some would apt to financial analyzing, and some have strength in advertsing. Next, we can decline our weak points in related fields by grasping the learning chance of communicating with them. Thus, when the young are preparing for the power, they are more likely to transform their compeptitors' advantages into their own, which benefits their outstanding performances.
Secondly, there is a possibility that cooperation provides a atmsphere with the same opinions which hinders critical thinking in analyzing issues. However, the does not mean only those who share similar views could cooperate with each other. When following flexible rules in the team, people with different points of view can mitigate the conflicts and maximize the acceptable part. Think about the think tank in the company. Since it contains experts from various fields, it is common that they usually hold conflict views when making strategy decisions for the firm. The think tank would not separate into opposite teams to provide suggestions to the authority, on the contrary, the members would negotiate together for the final guide, since the core aim is to enhance the company's benefit. During the process, the experts have to balance both sides of the strategy, which definitely develop their crtical thinking ability.
Lastly, it is also likely that competition brings strains and rattle the young during their growth, then in this case, they would suffer from mental health problems if they could not handle the stress. Yet this arugument assmue that younger people lack self-regulation skills, which is not so likely to be found nowadays, since the schools, the governments, or other organaizations offer plentiful lessons and acticities in mental health. Moreover, sterling competitions could fosten our ambition towards success, and help us to keep in faith when get into troubles. Becaues in such competitions, the outcomes are not vital as the process, so that our competitors are also our friends and mentors, they are willing to share and teach us in resovling problems.
To sum up, without considering about these circumstances above, it is unwarrented to undermining the significantof competition, so that we should encourage the young to get involved in more competitions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-28 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supportin 79
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 83
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 83
- The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company When XYZ lays off employees it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating r sum s and developing interviewing skills if they so desire Laid off employees have benefited greatl 59
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...a possibility that cooperation provides a atmsphere with the same opinions which ...
^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ximize the acceptable part. Think about the think tank in the company. Since it contains ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...making strategy decisions for the firm. The think tank would not separate into opposite t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, while, for instance, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2675.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33932135729 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86999157595 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566866267465 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 801.0 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.10617977528 354% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7472283514 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.789473684 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3684210526 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219260525489 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587522198526 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713176996984 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120288519327 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924290170529 0.0667264976115 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 100.480337079 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.