Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement

Some people opine that today people have excessive options. I completely agree with the statement that these days people have so many options and will explain the reasons why.

Firstly, the advancement of technology has increased the number of choices for many things. The technology advancement has made corporations to develop more sophisticated products as well as invent new high-technology products. As a result, lot of developments have made and many high-technology gadgets can be easily found in the marketplace. It will not be hard for people to pick the gadget that will meet their personal needs. For instance, there are a lot of brands and types of smartphones with their own specifications. Each of them has their uniqueness and specialties, and also has different price range. Even though they are all still smartphones, but the choices of types and brands are now very wide. This growing number of options has ease people to choose what type smartphone is suitable with their financial ability and needs.

Secondly, the increasing intensity of competition has lead to many firms to make similar products. Because a lot of companies want to be profitable, thus they decided to follow the trend. They then created product which is trending at current time. As a result, the choices for a type of product are growing, and people started to have excessive options. For example, currently online food delivery service is trending among young people. A lot of corporations then began to follow the trend and started to provide their own online food delivery services. This then lead to the growing number of online food delivery services and has made people to have so many choices. For people, this can be beneficial because they have big flexibility in choosing what online food delivery service is suitable with them.

In conclusion, I agree that these days people have so many options, because the advancement of technology has increased the number of choices for many things and the increasing intensity of competition has lead to many firms to make similar products.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11403508772 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81020925999 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450292397661 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5598358113 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0526315789 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52631578947 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201373231621 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676996220338 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679628072039 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158549326395 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633892375734 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.