The diagram compares the number of visitors from abroad to different regions of one
country in Europe over the period 1987 to 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the figures saw an increase during most of the period, despite
some fluctuations. The coast, and the lakes and mountains were the areas most visited by
overseas tourists.
In 1987, there were 40,000 overseas visitors to the coast. This was higher than the
number who visited Series 3 or the lakes and mountains, at 20,000 and 10,000
respectively. By 2002, overseas visitor numbers to the coast had risen to 62,000.
However, this was overtaken by the figure for those who visited the lakes and mountains,
which increased dramatically to reach a peak of 70,000. The numbers visiting Series 3
fluctuated, reaching about 25,000 in 2002.
Between 2002 and 2007, there was a steady decline in overseas visitors to the lakes and
mountains, falling to around 66,000 at the end of the period. After peaking at 70,000
during these years, the number of overseas visitors to the coast decreased to 55,000 in
2007. In contrast, overseas visitor numbers to Series 3 witnessed a rise to reach a peak of
35,000 in 2007
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 56
- a survey conducted for the places in which people gain access the internet from 1998 to 2005 78
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 81
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97487437186 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52111108662 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542713567839 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6196271761 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 3.83414634146 365% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23876225367 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114822204901 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817110974759 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963603467833 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822348559632 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.