Some students prefer to study alone. Others prefer to study with a group of students. Which
do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
It is critically important and needS of the time that we encourage our students and future generations to work in harmony. And if this habit is developed from young age it will have long lasting effects. So, I agree that students should work together in groups. I will explore the reasons of this choice in following paragraphs.
To begin with, working in a group teaches the students the importance of teamwork. They get to know that outcomes of working together is more fruitful than working individually. Besides, it creates competition among the students, and they are motivated towards working hard. On the contrary, if students work independently, they are always alone with no sense of motivation. My own example is a compelling explanation for this. I was used to study alone, and I always ended up leaving my syllabus to cover just before exams. But last year one of my friends motivated me to study together, and this change the whole scenario for me. The competition, that my friends are working hard to get their target encourages me to work with them too. On top, now I can finish my course books before exams and realize that unity is my strength.
Furthermore, students can help each other and work to improve each other weaknesses. It does not only create sense of empathy toward each other but also enhance the knowledge of those students who are helping their colleagues. Another reason, these moral lessons brighten their personalities in future too. For instance, I am adept in organic Chemistry, but I do not feel myself doing revision which could affect my performance. I came across the fact that my friend is struggling in my expertise field. Working in a group creates the sense of responsibility and I promised to help her improve her weaknesses. Also, I got a chance of revising my own syllabus too. I will continue to practice this pleasing attitude in future. In contrast, I might not be confident to offer her my help in the studies when I was doing it myself.
In conclusion. I realize the virtues of group study. Because unity is that strength which initiates the habit of working hard and by helping each other we are not only supportive, but we are also enlightening our personality towards a bright future
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-14 | Rustin_Panda | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-04 | shabnam_520 | 74 | view |
| 2021-10-14 | Owenbang | 60 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | reeya kiran | 60 | view |
| 2021-07-15 | quanlqd | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to studying'.
Suggestion: used to studying
... compelling explanation for this. I was used to study alone, and I always ended up leaving my...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 716, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...inue to practice this pleasing attitude in future. In contrast, I might not be confident ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82901554404 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76836231398 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523316062176 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2523701331 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6666666667 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0833333333 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70833333333 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147546537515 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431295092769 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040898456838 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863562326074 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256278442345 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.