Some people think that we cannot learn the qualities of truly successful people at any universities or institutions.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this idea?
Success means a lot to people regardless of who they are. However, some people hold the view that the qualities of real successful individuals cannot be acquired from schooling. I just agree with this idea to some extent and this essay will clarify my position.
To begin with, it is an indisputable fact that some typical qualities of successful people cannot not be passed on from one person to another through education. One primary element is their talent, a gift from God and some people are lucky enough to possess such talents. For instance, Messi has gifted skills to play football and no matter how hard other people try, it is impossible to play the game at the level of Messi as his talent is unique. Moreover, successful people often have particular living conditions forming their characters such as diligence, perseverance, determination, sensitivity and honesty but schools may find it hard to recreate such conditions for students to develop such precious qualities. Evidence shows that some people are especially sensitive and determined basically because they have an adverse childhood and their living condition required them to observe and learn constantly. Finally, Luck is undoubtedly an essential factor leading to people’s success but schools never have the ability to make their students lucky. Some people claim that Bill Gates is so successful partly because he is lucky to be in the right place at the right time.
It is, however, unjustified to deny the roles and substantial contributions of formal education to people’s accomplishments. First of all, universities and institutions provide learners with an ideal environment to develop their skills and equip them with knowledge to work in the knowledge-based economy. At school, the program is logically designed by fully-qualified experts and students are inspired as well as pushed by gifted educators with their dedication and passion for their mission. Hence, students can save a lot of time for learning and they may fully deploy their talents when they are in a proper condition with good guidance. A comprehensive study conducted in various settings reveals that the impacts of teachers on students are immense and long-lasting. Besides, pressure from peers also plays a role in pushing students to advance on their ladder of success. For example, when comparing themselves with friends at school, students will soon realize what they need to do to keep pace with peers and to effectively develop themselves. Last but not least, a qualification earned from a reputable school is a basic requirement for many work positions in today’s world. No hospitals and schools accept doctors or teachers without relevant qualifications.
In conclusion, it is hard to learn all the qualities of successful people from schools but there is no point in denying the values of formal schooling to people’s success and happiness. Hence, young people should be encouraged to access high education so that they can maximize their potentials and live out their dreams.
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was brought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to solve this problem 73
- NOWADAYS MANY parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What is the reason for doing this Is this a positive and negative development 73
- Some educationalists think that international exchange visits will benefit teenagers at school To what extent advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2560.0 1615.20841683 158% => OK
No of words: 488.0 315.596192385 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24590163934 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92647918758 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 176.041082164 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543032786885 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 780.3 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.306726565 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.904761905 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2380952381 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 8.67935871743 219% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288652052912 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895254173353 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671270005084 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206195698539 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788644378409 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.