The line graph illustrates China and the US in terms of newborn rate from 1920 to 2000.
Overall, the birth rates of both countries saw upward trends in spite of some fluctuations over the period of 80 years. The figure for the US was higher than that of China in most years shown.
In 1920, the birth rate of China was 10%, while that of the US was slightly higher, at about 11%. The figure for China fluctuated during the years and increased to 15% before sharply dropped to 5% in the 1940-1945 period. Similarly, there was a marginal fluctuation in the American birth rate before reaching the lowest point of under 5% in 1945.
The noticeable feature is that China witnessed a dramatic rose in birth rate and overtook the figure of the US to hit the peak of 20% by 1950. In this same period, the rate in the US also climbed, but lower, at 15%. These two rates then all fell significantly over the rest of the period, at around 2% and 7% in China and the US, respectively.
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made 84
- the graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, then, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38461538462 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3683804464 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554945054945 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1844761963 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244010784 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113073608426 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769963644101 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174655296862 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737433728626 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.