The line graph compares data on the amount of water usage for three different sectors in the world from 1990 to 2000 and the table shows Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo in terms of water consumption.
Overall, Agriculture was by far the major sector consumed water in over the world. It is noticeable that water consumption per person in Brazil is much higher than that of the other country.
In 1990, about 500 km3 water was used for Agriculture, while the figures for Industry and Domestic were just negligible. The amount of water consumed for these three sectors then gradually increased during the years shown. In detail, Industrial sector used rosed significantly by nearly 1000 km3 over the 10 years, compared to the figure for Domestic sector which consumed about over 500 km3 in the end of the period. Specially, there was a sharply climb in the amount of water used for Agricultural sector and this figure reached the peak of above 3000 km3 by 2000.
Looking at the table, we can see that the population of Brazil is much higher than that of Congo 176 and 5.2 million respectively, while the irrigated land in Democratic Republic of Congo is 100 km2, which is nearly higher four times than that of Brazil. However the amount of water usage for a Brazilian is 359 m3 compared to the figure for a citizen in Congo is just 8 m3.
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 56
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 67
- the graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children
- The graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy in the UK 2000 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('sharply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('climb') instead of another adjective.
...end of the period. Specially, there was a sharply climb in the amount of water used for Agricul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... higher four times than that of Brazil. However the amount of water usage for a Brazili...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66806722689 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47440467247 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508403361345 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4711952422 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.444444444 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168117881167 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853654031164 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508619123787 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118928304422 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568595343582 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.