Films were produced by big companies in the past, but today people are able to make a film. Do you think this trend is positive or negative?
It is true that the film made by people is more popular than ones produced by big companies. Some people think that this trend enhances people’s creativity and artistry, while others claim that it exerts negative effects on film quality. I partly agree with this topic because of some below reasons.
Granted, it is clear that people have ability and desire to express their personality and opinion through creating art, especially film. Thanks to the development of technology, people are acceptable to high quality cameras and techniques to make what they want. More movies they provided, more knowledge they broaden. Furthermore, audiences are able to enhance their views and chose what is suitable. The content of movies are not limited in range of companies and closed to the real life. Therefore, many people chose amateur films to experience a friendly vision.
However, to produce a quality film, they need a professional ekip with director, producer, sound and light maker, etc. It helps companies elevate the audience’s standard and future of art. Besides, under the management of laws and government, the films make by companies are controlled quality and morality. There are a lot of violent movies are not suitable for children broadcast on youtube and internet. It is a reason why many children mimic dangerous actions in films which are made by amateurs.
In conclusion, I would argue that although the socialization of film production has several advantages, it also has some negative influences in the development of social and children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-19 | fanncia99 | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | perry1812 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | Le Bich Diep | 56 | view |
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles 61
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 73
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 84
- The chart below shows the number and purposes of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007 78
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23107569721 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75857218151 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605577689243 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7233186715 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316096637181 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900753028298 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723978272978 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173902868755 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782867433508 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.