The graph above shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of mear in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The bar graph depicts the consumed fish, lamb, beef and chicken in a European country between the period of 1979 to 2004.
In conclusion, it can be manifested that the consumption of chicken increase. While other fish and meat are declines. Chicken and lamb started to point at a similar.
First of all, In 1979 the amount of beef consumed per person per week was more than 200 grams s and it was a decrease with the may fluctuations at 100 games in the year of 2004. While fish starting the year in consumed 55 grams per person per week and it was few less and steady trend at just 47 grams s in the year of 2004.
In contrast, chicken and beef started 150 grams es per person per week in 1979. The former one was increasing during the period it just reached 250 grams by the year 2004. And letter one it was visa verse trend it 70 grams less happened during the time period and stopped it. Which were 70 grams at the end of the year(2004).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-21 | Nugi | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | Jatin Chaudhari | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-29 | Rakesh bhoi | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-26 | R.K | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...s. Chicken and lamb started to point at a similar. First of all, In 1979 the amount of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... during the time period and stopped it. Which were 70 grams at the end of the year200...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32203389831 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16489626327 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3036641439 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140479876128 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641909295286 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937148060814 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124635500427 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12261404791 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.48 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.