Many individuals argue that the news broadcasted in social media, mainly highlights the disputes and criticalities rather than upward growth, which has an adverse effect on both the citizens and the community. I certainly disagree with the above notion and believe that showing the pain areas of society helps the local public to grow in a continuous manner.
When social media, mainly televised media, make communal problems a core subject of their TV shows, they show a bitter truth of the society which no one wants to hear. In simple words, they highlight the struggle of a common man and social issues, like poverty, unemployment, and anarchy in the state. Such an approach helps the individuals and the state to work on the areas which require immediate attention for the betterment of the people. For instance, many famous news channels, like BBC News, publish a separate section of news on environmental and social issues in the columns of their newspapers. This allows the government and policymakers to eliminate the problems and make lives better for the people.
Apart from this, the positive trend of a state’s development shown by the media does not add much value to the individual’s lives, and this diverts their minds from the real issues of the society. Secondly, the effectiveness of a positive development can be experienced by the local residents in their everyday lives; therefore there is no point in advertising the success stories which the public is already benefitting from. In some developing countries, China, for example, it is illegal to broadcast anything against the government policies, and media professionals are forced by the government administrators to show a false picture of a state, with positive developments, to the people. Such an approach deters the socio-economic development of a country.
In conclusion, it has been long debated that in spite of focusing on the growth, journalists particularly concentrate on the problem areas of the state. I opine that focusing only on the positives diverts our minds from the real problems and restricts the growth of the individuals as well as the community.
- You have seen an advertisement in the local newspaper about helping to improve the environment Write a letter to the editor and explain Why you are interested in it How you can help When you are available 89
- Some people think it is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment for people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- You are not happy with the course you are doing at college and would like to change to a different course Write a letter to the college director requesting to change the course What course you are following now Why you are not satisfied with the course Wh 61
- The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing Do you agree or disagree 73
- Scientists believe computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people think the development have a positive impact others think it is negative To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a continuous manner" with adverb for "continuous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n areas of society helps people to grow in a continuous manner. When social media, mainly news chan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17528735632 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95300952023 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494252873563 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8670496048 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.538461538 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7692307692 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198616090042 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728880740109 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403003243535 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116604382824 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395666038085 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.