The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
There exist two pie charts concerning energy in Australia. The upper one manifests the mean usage of energy exercised in the area of the household, and the lower one illustrates the fraction of production of greenhouse gas emanated from the aforementioned section.
Turning to the household, as can be seen, the lion's share majority of energy is getting through for heating and acquiring heat water, 42%, and 30%, respectively. Moreover, notwithstanding for cooling, lighting, and refrigeration, the percentage of usage is 2%, 4%, and 7%, respectively. Other appliances burn only 15%, which is approximately commensurate with the summation of the three mentioned items.
Regarding the greenhouse emissions stemming from these sections, whilst the highest amount is ascribed to water heating (32%) and other appliances (28%). The total fraction of gases produced in sections of refrigeration, heating, and cooling is squarely tantamount to water heating, i.e., 32%.
Overall, it can be seen although, in comparison to all sections, the consumption of gas in heating is the apotheosis, its emission is by far lower than half of the water heating. In the antithesis point, nonetheless, other appliances in among economical gas burner, they can be entailed in the highest gas producers.
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 73
- Many people today find that the cost of attaining a University-level education is extremely high for the students and their families. What are the causes of this situation, and how can governments, Universities and the students themselves overcome the pr 67
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 100
- It is sometimes said that the countryside offers a high quality of life especially for families What are the arguments for and against families choosing to live and work in the countryside for example as farmers What is your own view about this 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected personal relationships Has this become a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4824120603 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19406725108 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592964824121 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0890089064 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.222222222 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14712483147 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599496413404 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516078586326 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895312692377 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617000372501 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.