The chart below gives information about the growth of the urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future.
The manifested bar chart evinces some information about the build-up of the populous cosmopolitans in some specific areas, such as Africa, Asia, and Latin America, in three different years encompassing the foresight of the future.
Regarding the chart, as can be seen, in 1950, although Africa had the lowest population (well above 10%), their population got up to par with Asia in 2000 (around 39%). Moreover, during half a century commencing from 1950, Latin America kept its first rank in the number of people in comparison to the rest of the world from 41% in 1950 to 70% in 2000.
Turning to what happens in the future, nay, in 2030, predictions foresee that the countries of Latin American will still remain the populous countries in the world, i.e., exactly 80%, which is 20% more than the rest of the world. Furthermore, Asia keeps the lead in the number of people (approximately 55%) comparing to the African countries (just above 50%), again.
Overall, it can be concluded that Latin America during these years from 1950 to 2030 can be deemed as crowded countries. On top of this, the number of people in African and Asian countries is below par of the world.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
2023-07-30 | TLan168 | view | |
2023-07-30 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
2023-07-30 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
- The bar chart shows the expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 di erent areas 57
- Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not e ective Education and job training should be used instead Do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 100
- Young couples nowadays prefer to have fewer children than the previous generation Most of them prefer to accomplish other goals in their life first Is this a positive or negative development 61
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83582089552 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5431695176 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597014925373 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.989378274 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.857142857 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138810807307 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622764692947 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478806224112 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824253608362 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234183335035 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.