The graph below show the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a Europeon country between 1979 and 2004

Essay topics:

The graph below show the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a Europeon country between 1979 and 2004.

The given line graph illustrates the information regarding the consumption of chicken, beef, lamb and fish in Europeon country by per person per week between 25 years.

It can be apparently over-viewed that, in Europe per person consume more chicken as contrast to fish. Moreover, beef and Lamb followed the downward trend in last given year.

As can be witnessed from the given information, from year 1979 to 2004, consumption of fish followed the downward trend as compared to chicken. It was about 50 grams taken by per person till the year 2004, Chicken consumed around 150 grams in year 1979 which was followed zig-zag trend till the last year and it prioritised more in year 2004.

Further demonstrating the key features, Beef taken by individual around 200 grams whereas Lamb consumed 50 grams less than Beef in year 1979. After year 1984, every individual preffer chicken and dramatic decline seen in the consumption of neef and lamb till the last year and this place taken by chicken.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-01-07 dilpreet7528 view
2021-01-07 dilpreet7528 view
2021-01-07 dilpreet7528 view
2021-01-07 dilpreet7528 56 view
2021-01-07 dilpreet7528 61 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user dilpreet7528 :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the downward trend in last given year. As can be witnessed from the given infor...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...nd it prioritised more in year 2004. Further demonstrating the key features, Beef ta...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...round 200 grams whereas Lamb consumed 50 grams less than Beef in year 1979. After...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, moreover, regarding, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97023809524 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53461718945 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511904761905 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4849493414 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.285714286 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136523978253 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723488041812 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697400041252 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972209982593 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726708726179 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.