The chart below shows the percentage of total US population aged 65 and over between 1900 and 2000.
The chart gives information about the proportion of people who were 65 years old and above during the period of one century from 1900 to 2000.
Overall, there were general upward trends in the percentage of American senior citizens. It is also clear that the population of those at the age of 65 to 74 was by far higher than the other two groups.
In general, the proportion of the elderly in the United States increased nearly threefold over the given period, from 4.1% in 1900 to 12.4% in 2000.
In 1900, 2.9% of the total population was aged 65 to 74, followed by a noticeable increase to 6.1% in both 1960 and 1970. Afterwards, the figure for this age group continued to rise slightly to 7.3 % before experiencing a slow fall to 6.5 in 2000.
In comparison, the percentages of British people in the 75-84 and 85 and over age group remained almost the same in the first three decades. After that, these two groups went up continually to hit their highest points of 4.4% and 1.5% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-17 | khuekhue | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | khuekhue | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-14 | denistran85 | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-13 | asmita acharya | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-12 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
- WITHOUT CAPITAL PUNISHMENT THE DEATH PENALTY OUR LIVES ARE LESS SECURE AND CRIMES OF VIOLENCE INCREASE CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IS ESSENTIAL TO CONTROL VIOLENCE IN SOCIETY TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 61
- Every year an increasing number of people suffer from fast food related diseases The government therefore should impose a high tax on fast food To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 56
- The pie charts below show information about where coffee is produced consumed where its profit goes 67
- The charts compare the number of people per household in the UK in 1981 and 2001 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60335195531 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54403198986 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648044692737 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.9208879284 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296894307233 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109884352928 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665239938855 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141507893362 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472330796482 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.