Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning. Why does this happen? What are the solutions?
These days, it is reported that an increasing number of school leavers tend to develop negative thoughts about schools. In general, there are several main reasons associated with this situation and some possible solutions can be taken to alleviate it in an effective way.
The fact that those leaving school usually dislike learning is attributed to a host of reasons. The first one is due to the inappropriate school curriculum. Particularly, students are generally supposed to learn unnecessary subjects such as history which requires them to memorize specific terms and dates in every lesson. However, students consider it a waste of time and find it unimportant to their future career. In addition, boring teaching techniques should be blamed for. Specifically, teachers have a tendency to deliver lessons based on conventional teaching methods. In other words, there is no interaction in the classroom since students have to learn by heart most of the facts from textbook without a deep understanding of the content. This eventually leads to tedious days at school.
There are certain steps that can be addressed to cope with students who experience negative emotions toward school. To begin with, the Ministry of Education is advised to transform school programs. For example, unnecessary subjects should be replaced by practical courses, namely problem-solving skills, teamwork and collaboration and critical thinking skills which are likely to give learners precious opportunities to apply theoretical knowledge to real life situations. More importantly, there is a need for innovative lesson plans by taking advantage of multimedia, for example, video clips or music and creating interactive activities. This would help turn the classroom into a lively learning environment and promote students’ engagement.
In conclusion, the negative opinion of learning among younger generations is mainly caused by the way the school curriculum and lessons are designed. Nevertheless, the measures mentioned above can be taken into account to change students’ thinking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
- The table illustrates the percentage of male and female in terms of weight in Vietnam from 1999 to 2009 78
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 90
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 78
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 78
- Every year an increasing number of people suffer from fast food related diseases The government therefore should impose a high tax on fast food To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... solutions can be taken to alleviate it in an effective way. The fact that those leaving school u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in general, such as, by the way, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6178343949 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04853433717 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649681528662 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5041957414 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.764705882 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159505254244 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506333427141 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486516592175 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927114143982 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00935516631068 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.