University only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook. Agree or disagree.
It is undeniable the fact that in recent decades educational institutions have changed their approach in the way they deliver content to students. Many universities are implementing a digital only policy, when it comes to share knowledge, whereas the updating of textbooks is becoming a real rare practice in this field. I particularly agree with organizations which are opting to convert their content to digital platforms. To commence with, there are a myriad of reasons I believe universities should endorse the digitalization of their books. One of the most important reasons is that by doing so, high education establishments reduce their emission of harmful gases to the atmosphere, by mitigating the number of trees cut to produce paper and ultimately books. Therefore, it can positively impact the overall health of the planet in the decades to come. On the other hand, some people might argue that universities which are moving towards digital platforms are contributing to the loss of glamour and charm of the paper based written books. For those critics, I believe they can still have a taste of these iconic publications by only attending libraries, which have a vast range of books and literature to be consumed by avid readers. In essence, I reiterate my opinion that universities should continue to apply digital media as their principal source of knowledge, a movement that only benefits the society and the entire world, while preserving the priceless books published in the past.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-01-23 | PAULO ROBERTO OLIVEIRA SILVA | 55 | view |
2020-11-09 | Basil3241 | 67 | view |
2020-09-23 | parveen123456 | 77 | view |
2020-07-16 | mike trazer | 54 | view |
2020-06-06 | mike trazer | 82 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 456, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...latforms. To commence with, there are a myriad of reasons I believe universities shoul...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, therefore, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19008264463 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95367553511 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603305785124 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5991195255 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.555555556 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187078154533 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696663083106 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669767289055 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187078154533 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.