The chart illustrates the consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015.
The supplied line graph reveals the information about consumption across hamburgers, fried chicken and pizza by adolescents in Mauritius between 1985 and 2015.
Overall, consumption of hamburgers and fried chicken experience a upward trend over the period and they were considerably more consumption among three kinds of foods at the end of the period. In contrast, Pizza consumption declined rapidly throughout the period, and it was the lowest consumption.
With regards to hamburgers and pizza, consumption of them started at 10 times eaten per year and 5 times eaten per year respectively. After 1988, the figure for eating hamburgers grew significantly to the peak at slightly over 70 times eaten per year in 2013, reaching its highest consumption at the end of the period. In addition, followed a similar rise trend, consumption of fried chicken skyrocketed to 60 times eaten per year in 2008, reaching a plateau until 2010, and then continued to increase steadily to around 62 times eaten per year in 2013.
In contrast, pizza consumption began at 60 times eaten per year in 1985. After that, there was a around 20 times eaten per year sharp drop by 2000. Starting at which point, it was outraced by the number of hamburgers and fried chicken. After 2000, it continued to decline rapidly, reaching the low point at 10 times eaten per year until 2013.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-03 | Anh15799 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-03 | Anh15799 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008
- The graph below shows the amount of goods transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002 67
- The chart illustrates the consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 73
- Tourism is encouraged in many countries Does tourism brings more advantages or disadvantages 78
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers They are used in business hospitals crime detection and even to fly planes What things will they be used for in the future Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious for 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 65, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hamburgers and fried chicken experience a upward trend over the period and they w...
^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...per year in 1985. After that, there was a around 20 times eaten per year sharp dr...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03097345133 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76273845743 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504424778761 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5837427348 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.7 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108915242045 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561104293336 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616742454215 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970141269742 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633118523951 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.