pursue scientific knowledge, for knowledge itself or for practical use.
It has long been a subject of discussion whether pursue scientific knowledge, for knowledge itself or for practical use or not. In my opinion, the former notion has several elements that deserve attention and I will explain why using pertinent arguments.
There are myriad of arguments in favor of the context, and the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that people should be extra careful with their decisions. For example, according to a recent survey done by the Stanford University, 45% people benefit from the above mentioned notion, whereas 30% people face disadvantages due to it. Hence, it is apparent why many citizens are in favor of the above stance.
Another argument in support of view is that governments worldwide have become more active in dealing with this situation. To illustrate, as per recent academic research carried out by the Australian government, 60% citizens gained immensely from the proposed government reforms. They improved their existing scenario tremendously and that paved the way for a better economic future. Therefore, not only will this make people careful and pragmatic in their approach, but also will it lead to a better living standard.
It has long been a subject of discussion whether pursue scientific knowledge, for knowledge itself or for practical use or not. In my opinion, the former notion has several elements that deserve attention and I will explain why using pertinent arguments.
There are myriad of arguments in favor of the context, and the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that people should be extra careful with their decisions. For example, according to a recent survey done by the Stanford University, 45% people benefit from the above mentioned notion, whereas 30% people face disadvantages due to it. Hence, it is apparent why many citizens are in favor of the above stance.
Another argument in support of view is that governments worldwide have become more active in dealing with this situation. To illustrate, as per recent academic research carried out by the Australian government, 60% citizens gained immensely from the proposed government reforms. They improved their existing scenario tremendously and that paved the way for a better economic future. Therefore, not only will this make people careful and pragmatic in their approach, but also will it lead to a better living standard.
From what has been discussed above, it is clear that the benefits of the given topic significantly outweigh the drawbacks. Lastly, in my opinion, it would be wise to say pursue scientific knowledge for knowledge, for knowledge itself or for practical use.
- Should developing countries concentrate on improving industrial skills or should they promote education first 92
- criteria should be used to decide people are paid different occupations 77
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The world s governments are organization are facing a lot of issues 77
- ownership of cars 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 20.9802955665 186% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 31.9359605911 172% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2224.0 1207.87684729 184% => OK
No of words: 424.0 242.827586207 175% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24528301887 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 3.92707691288 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76820087751 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.349056603774 0.580463131201 60% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 692.1 379.143842365 183% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6551724138 158% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5896719807 50.4703680194 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.2 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.12807881773 170% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 6.9802955665 201% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317706498119 0.242375264174 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117452395845 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.228526839774 0.071462118173 320% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231718818552 0.151781067708 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.224576923041 0.0609392437508 369% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.32886699507 87% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.