The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities
The two maps depict an island, before and after the construction of a few tourist facilities. As it is shown in the maps, dramatic changes have occurred on the island.
Looking at the first map, we can clearly see that the island was a plane piece of land with a few trees mainly in the eastern side. There is a beach to the west of the island. There were hardly any other natural and manmade features on the island.
In the second map, we can see accommodation facilities for tourists. There is a cluster of housing in the west and also another cluster of housing in the centre of the island. There is a restaurant and reception area between these housing centres. The houses on the west are connected by a footpath which also extends to the beach. Tourists can swim around the beach. There is a vehicle track around the reception area. It extends to the restaurant on the north and the pier in the south from where tourists can enjoy boating and fishing. Overall, the construction has made the island a tourist attraction.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 75
- technology has made children less creative 73
- Underwater whales produce loud noises known as songs Scientists use whale songs to study the movements for migrations of groups of whales Recently scientists discovered something unusual a single solitary whale whose song is unlike that of all other known 66
- Some students prefer study independently while some student like study as a group (1) 66
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57297297297 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49549484503 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535135135135 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1587487403 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.0769230769 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.2307692308 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.23076923077 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283563143329 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100101733843 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138119345221 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221111851494 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14147551874 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.63 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.