There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species.
Protecting animals and plants has been matter of concern over decades since people become more and more conscious about the relationship between human and environment. While some people think it is essential to save endangered species, the statement says that putting too much effort on it is of little justification. However, in my point of view, we should strike a balance between overdoing and doing nothing at all to reach the greatest benefit for all.
First of all, we human have the culpability of the environmental damage. For example, large scale of deforestation for economic reasons has caused many animals to lose their habitats, let alone hundreds and thousands of trees being cut down. Overfishing in some rivers and gulfs has drastically diminished the amount of water creatures. Species would not be endangered if the existence of human does not jeopardize on their living.
Moreover, when we see certain species are struggling to live, we feel our responsibilities from heart to give them a hand. What makes human different from other animals is that we care about and have empathy toward those in need. If we are capable of saving others, why don't we strive to do it? After all, we are members within the intricate interrelationship of the ecosystem. If certain species is endangered, it is likely to cause a devastated impact among a series of other species. As a result, we may put ourselves in danger too.
Some people draw disagreement upon this issue by expressing the view that there may be more urgent issue awaits for the government to deal with. Indeed, if we are facing a disease pandemic, people suffering from hunger or poor economic growth, allocation of the budget should be considered seriously. Other detractors may also say that species being endangered is a result of "natural selection". Given that Darwin's theory may be true, we cannot deny the fact that creatures living on the mother earth are closely bond together. No one knows which species will be the next to face extinction.
In conclusion, what amount of money and jobs should be placed on saving animals and plants should be evaluated carefully in various aspects. Government is better to get experts involved before making any decision on this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | AtharvaKale | 83 | view |
| 2022-09-07 | Sumilak | 83 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | Siam | 66 | view |
- According to an independent poll of 200 charitable organizations overall donations of money to nonprofit groups increased last year but educational institutions did not fare as well as other organizations Donations to international aid groups increased th 57
- The Mozart School of Music should be the first choice for parents considering enrolling their child in music lessons First of all the Mozart School welcomes youngsters at all ability and age levels there is no audition to attend the school Second the scho 50
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 58
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens 83
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of weather a 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...If we are capable of saving others, why dont we strive to do it? After all, we are m...
^^^^
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lt, we may put ourselves in danger too. Some people draw disagreement upon this ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fore making any decision on this issue.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, after all, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.064 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85465888213 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610666666667 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3901116133 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.95 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165768043718 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446183756934 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421430785524 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095998969469 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409023916183 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.