Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Different types of governments rule their countries differently. Comunist governments do not consider the will of its people while making decisions. On the other hand, in democratic countries, sometimes will of the majority of people can be adverse for the progress of the nation. Shell the government officials rely on their own judgement, or unquestioningly carry out the will of majority? A balance between these two extreemes is the only way to lead the country successfully.
Firstly, considering democratic communities, here the decisions of a governmet are in the most cases equivalent to the will of the majority of people. It were the people, who choose the ruling party, and the party should refflect peoples views. Considering, however, the level of logical thinking ability among the nation, the great majority of people would fall somewhere in the middle of the range of intelligence quotient. Decisions considered preferable by the majority, may not necessarily be beneficial for the nation.
Secondly, oftentimes people are not informed about all implications of a given decision. In my country, everyone was very excited to join the European Union. Wealth of the countries in the Western Europe enticed many to vote for joining them. Not many, however, were aware of all the consequences that follow the accession. Although most of people were enthusiastic about it, only government officials were aware of pros and cons of joining.
To recapitulate, comprehensive information about a given proposal is indispensible to make a proper decision, no matter if it is the government or the people that take the responsibility for proposed change. In some cases it is impossible for the people to study all consequences of a given government's decision. It this case, a governent officials that represent the nation, should consider all advantages and disadvantages, and decide for the best interest of the nation.
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the m 83
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 70
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 77
- The best test of an argument is the argument s ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 68
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 85
Comments
Hi Agata, we realized that
Hi Agata, we realized that you have problems on submitting speaking, can you let us know what the issue is? So we can help you.
You can submit your problems on questions part too:
http://testbig.com/questions/ask
Enjoy testbig,
EssayE-rater
Sentence: It this case, a governent officials that represent the nation, should consider all advantages and disadvantages, and decide for the best interest of the nation.
Description: A pronoun, personal, nominative, 3rd person singular is not usually followed by a determiner/pronoun, singular
Suggestion: Refer to It and this
Sentence: A balance between these two extreemes is the only way to lead the country successfully.
Error: extreemes Suggestion: extremes
Sentence: Firstly, considering democratic communities, here the decisions of a governmet are in the most cases equivalent to the will of the majority of people.
Error: governmet Suggestion: government
Sentence: It were the people, who choose the ruling party, and the party should refflect peoples views.
Error: refflect Suggestion: reflect
Sentence: It this case, a governent officials that represent the nation, should consider all advantages and disadvantages, and decide for the best interest of the nation.
Error: governent Suggestion: government
flaws:
No. of Words: 305 350
No. of Different Words: 163 200
better to have more words in real exam. More words, more marks.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 305 350
No. of Characters: 1579 1500
No. of Different Words: 163 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.179 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.177 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.04 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 117 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 74 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.941 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.216 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.529 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.321 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.522 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.08 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5