Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree with this opinion

Governments across the world are investing money to protect the wild animals and birds. While some people argue that too much money has been squandered for this, I strongly disagree as I feel that investment for protection of wild creatures are of paramount importance. In this essay, I will outline the reasons to justify the need for protection of wild animals and birds.

First of all, animals are part of the ecosystem and humans are responsible for maintaining the balance of it. Every fauna and flora of the ecosystem are of high significance and loss of any species will have an adverse effect on the human beings. Sparrows, for example, are crucial for reducing the insects that affect food crops. Recently, as there is a huge reduction of sparrows in South Africa, there has been a detrimental rise in insects and hence, many of the food crops are badly affected. Therefore, it is important to pay attention in preserving every creature of the ecosystem.

Another reason to support the investment is that many of the animals are on the verge of extinction. Sumatran tiger, for instance, have been vanishing at a faster rate even after government’s investment in their protection. As every animal has the same rights to live on the planet as humans, it is of great importance for the government to ensure animals’ survival too. However, apart from government’s investment private organizations and individuals too must invest in the protection of animals considering their importance in balancing the ecosystem.

In conclusion, animals are as important as human beings in the ecosystem, and it is the responsibility of the humans to concentrate on the protection of the animals and birds. Despite of governments’ investment many of the wild animals are under the verge of extinction, and private organizations and individuals must work concertedly with the government for preserving every creature of this world.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17197452229 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03922455204 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487261146497 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6710244373 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211900135003 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797453819264 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671199184557 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143302723126 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814490245388 0.056905535591 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.