Finding the most significant factor which plays a major role in forming long-lasting friendships has always been a tough work. In this regard, some people believe that some factors such as helping each other in difficult conditions or sharing same interest and leisure activities can be the most noticeable one, while some others think that having trust in each other plays a more important role. As far as I am concerned, I suppose that the second idea carries more weight. I will enlarge on my reasons in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, lengthy friendship is inextricably linked to mutual trust since without that nobody can continue to be a friend of others. To put it a more vivid picture, when friends do not believe each other, which means they cannot have mutual trust, they cannot talk about their secrets. As a result, they will not be able to solve each other’s problem because they are not cognizant of them. Take two friends who do not have this factor in their friendship, for example. Because of the lack of mutual trust, it is possible that they think if they tell each other their secrets, the other make fun of him or spread his secrets. Consequently, they tend to be silent, so their problems will remain unsolved.
Secondly, friends without mutual trust are often pessimistic to each other, which makes achieving to other purposes of being friend very challenging, and help each other when they need and sharing same hobbies are no exceptions. To clarify this point, friends cannot believe that they have a lot of things in common or cannot count each other helps in as they cannot trust each other. Thereby, no matter what they are doing, their deeds are not considered as useful ones, and that is due to the fact that they do not have mutual trust. As a way of illustration, take two friends who suffer from distrust. There is no way to understand that they are telling lies or not, and as they do not trust each other, they are pessimistic to every movement of others. So, without mutual trust, nothing will help a friendship to last longer.
To sum up, all things considered, I strongly believe that mutual trust is the most essential factor for a friendship to last as long as possible. Given the fact that, not only does mutual trust make a firm belief between friends, but also, it can lead to an optimistic thought which is really fundamental for every friendship.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Governments need to spend money on beautiful things more than on practical things 73
- TPO 56 80
- TPO 41 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Agree or disagree Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i suppose, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74285714286 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47610347833 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495238095238 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6237359407 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188302164918 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692608585937 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556549863995 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131085807287 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182483805567 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.