University students always focus on one specialist subjects but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

University students always focus on one specialist subjects, but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of students chose their own subjects in the campus and pay more attention to the majors. However, the universities students should study a variety of subjects rather than studying one particular subjects. This essay will highlight that this certainly is a rational approach that needs to be opted.

To commence with, there are deluge of arguments in the favour of my stance. The main preponderant one is that variety of subjects enhances their career growth because scholars can gain multifarious skills along with their professional skills. Thus, it enhance one's career as well as beneficial for the mankind. To cite an example, colleges could embark the subject of foreign culture and the public relationship, these courses is helpful for the juveniles as well as the others. Needless to say, all these Merits stand in one good stead as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.

Furthermore, another pivotal aspect of aforementioned prepositions is that it is solely likely to help one excel and thrive in various areas. Besides, students would join the other courses as to spur their hobbies namely Dance classes, Art classes, Physical education, Training and so on. To exemplify, A survey published by the University of America in april 2014 found that 80% of universities provide co-curricular courses for the students which impact the positive effects on the scholar's health.

On the other hand, a section of the society contradicts the above said view by providing some justification. They ponder that in order to reduce the nerve-racking faced by the pupils while education, the election of the main subject is compulsory. By focusing on tremendous courses, students often suffer from anxiety, stress or any other disorder, which, in turn harm by psychologically.

To conclude, undoubtedly, it's is essential that the colleges should provide more major subjects to the scholars that increases their knowledge and skills.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-03-06 Sndp kaur 89 view
2021-01-24 PRIYANKA1911 73 view
2021-01-06 gagandeep@13 73 view
2020-10-30 ashen.shenal 67 view
2018-07-31 apurwar 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deluges'?
Suggestion: deluges
...e opted. To commence with, there are deluge of arguments in the favour of my stance...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enhances'?
Suggestion: enhances
...ith their professional skills. Thus, it enhance ones career as well as beneficial for t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...r professional skills. Thus, it enhance ones career as well as beneficial for the ma...
^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sity of America in april 2014 found that 80% of universities provide co-curricula...
^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scholars'' or 'scholar's'?
Suggestion: scholars'; scholar's
...hich impact the positive effects on the scholars health. On the other hand, a sectio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e scholars health. On the other hand, a section of the society contradicts the...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, while, as to, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28353658537 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91804926721 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600609756098 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6047278351 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.533333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318649765482 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892329034042 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824554455957 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160747903354 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683945192568 0.056905535591 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.