The bar chart compares the amount of money put in on five leisure activities such as Cinema, Video, Music, Publishing, and Television in three areas of the world between 1995 and 2000. In general, the highest amount of money expended on entertainment facilities in the USA, and the least spent in Asia over the period of five years.
Now turning to the details, in 1995, 184 billion dollars went to five types of pleasure schemes by the USA, while Asia was 50% far lower, accounted for 67 billion only; Europe holds 97 billion of total expenses. It can be seen that, after 1995, all the territories experienced an increase in total expenses for all recreation until 2000. In 2000, much more money was wasted by the USA compares to other areas, which was showed 257 billion.
On the contrary, the most popular activities were publishing and television in all regions, whilst the less popular one was Cinema for a period of 5 years. Nearly as much money was spent on television as publishing from 1995 to 2000. A similar amount of expenditures made on Music by USA, Asia and Europe over the period. The expenses remained the same on cinema between 1995 and 2000.
- Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people Discuss both advantages and disadvantages 11
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five years period 73
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 67
- Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people Discuss the advantages and disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from yo 73
- More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation Describe some of the problems over reliance on can come and suggest at least one possible solution 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in general, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72058823529 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4776344819 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.562304817 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200434187772 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923757094651 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079355754522 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145607547629 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447131992606 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.