Some people say that the Internet is making the world smaller by bringing people together. To what extent do you agree that the internet is making it easier for people to communicate with one another?
In light of the proliferation of technology, the use of the Internet has witnessed a surge in recent years. Many hold that this outburst contributes to facilitate better connectivity and improve communication among users beyond any barriers. From my perspective, I totally agree with the quoted opinion.
Initially, the existence of websites, forums, and group chats enables users to have more communication options. These digital worlds, however, are a place that provides a secure atmosphere for people to freely communicate. Video-call, for instance, is known as an effective function and gets the high assessments as not only communicating in verbal, the users are allowed to know their partner’s feeling through their facial expressions. Additionally, the benefits of social networks are also advocated that owing to the comfort it brings. It is irrefutable that online communication is far less stressful than directly meeting as each massage is scrutinized and lessens the argument in the conservation.
Furthermore, online communication assists people to keep in touch with their beloveds without any bounders of the distance and time arrangement. Undeniably, the websites, social networks are obtainable, hence, the people are permitted to chat over the day even in nocturnal time. Moreover, people from different countries also easily protect maintain their relationships owing to the usage of the Internet. Take overseas students as an example, although they reside in such far places with diminishing time zone, the relationships surround them have still remained stable as they are entitled to make a phone call, chatting, and sharing with their families or peers.
In conclusion, with the mentioned reasons, the internet undoubtedly is a productive communication tool for people in general. It assists the users to delete any barriers and significantly improve their relationships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-19 | Chinkiarora | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | Chinkiarora | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | gtuez | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-10 | Trang Lưu Bảo Thắng | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-28 | quynhduong1210@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 11
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 84
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this overweigh its disadvantages 89
- The restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money on building new houses and roads Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- These days only few young people enjoy classical music concerts or play or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
... has witnessed a surge in recent years. Many hold that this outburst contributes to facil...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d sharing with their families or peers. In conclusion, with the mentioned reason...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63763066202 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18353657464 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613240418118 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0489655386 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.571428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221337940464 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714341676891 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661718370869 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13308540097 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481967111374 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
... has witnessed a surge in recent years. Many hold that this outburst contributes to facil...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d sharing with their families or peers. In conclusion, with the mentioned reason...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63763066202 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18353657464 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613240418118 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0489655386 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.571428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221337940464 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714341676891 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661718370869 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13308540097 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481967111374 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.