The bar chart and table illustrate figures related to households’ high-speed internet connection in five countries for two years, 2001 and 2002.
Based on the charts, during this period internet provision per population is improved for all countries, namely South Korea, Germany, Britain, Switzerland and USA.
As the diagram represents, internet access of three European countries in 2001 was between 3.3 and 3.6 per 1000 people, which is dramatically lower than that of South Korea at 122 and the USA at 93. Despite this, they all managed to enhance their internet provision by 2002, such that Britain, Germany and Switzerland boosted their services respectively by 230, 80 and 120 percent compared to the previous year, leading to internet connections of between 5.616 to 10.89 per thousand people.
On the other hand, United States also provided 170 percent connections compared to 2001 and overtook South Korea by reaching 251.1 connections per 1000 individuals. While South Korea’s internet improvement accounted for solely 20 percent which resulted in 134.4 connections per thousand people in 2002.
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your pos 50
- You forget your bag in the gym and gym management announced that the gym will be closed for a week for some renovation work. You need your bag as it has important things in it.Write a letter to the manager of the gym. In your letterintroduce yourself and 11
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil
- There is now evidence that the relaxed pace of life in small towns promotes better health and greater longevity than does the hectic pace of life in big cities Businesses in the small town of Leeville report fewer days of sick leave taken by individual w 60
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You shoul 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51744186047 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78105772043 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639534883721 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5646842972 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.166666667 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225585702849 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125819138573 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991500059843 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156767726095 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113315007289 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.