Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is tempting to view making new friends as more vital than keep your old friends. However, further analysis shows that keeping a relationship with your old friends is essential than creating a friendship with new people because friendship with old friends frequently emerged in childhood, circumstances- and time-proven. Therefore, I agree with that idea.
Clearly, old friends and old wine are better than new ones because these relationships were created many years ago, and they are valuable and powerful for both of you. It would be unwise not to mention that old friends and comrades proven over the years when you grew up together went to the same school, college, and university. Moreover, the LinkedIn survey has recently provided us with the research findings where people noticed that they are ready to keep current friendships with friends from the past than establish a new relationship with unfamiliar people.
Indeed, people should invest time and effort to make new friends, but it would be better and more effective to save current friends. For example, old friends know each other for many years; they have many stories they helped in challenging situations. Moreover, owing to the length of time old friends spend with an individual, they can see through all the concerned nuances. Therefore, in a world where everyone is ready to force their opinion on each other, old friends relieve us from unnecessary judgments. For instance, before I moved to the United States, my old friend showed me all advantages and disadvantages of my immigration.
Nevertheless, equally important to create new partnerships with unknown people because it will increase and ameliorate networking, either in-person or virtual. Why should we not underestimate new friends? The answer is plain to see: new friends right now could be the old friends in the future, and I dare say people should not ignore this process when new friends become old. For instance, when I started a new job, I realize that establishing a new relationship with colleagues is a crucial issue. Coworkers should accept this opportunity and create a long-term partnership that could become a friendship in the future.
In the final analysis, it appears that it is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Furthermore, has many advantages, such as saving relations with old friends is more productive and effective, time- and destiny-proven, and more reliable and trustworthy than new friends. Nonetheless, new friends will allow you to have old friends in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | sonyeoso | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | Mitra-T | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | YAGUT | 75 | view |
- The reading passage argues that R robustus was unlikely to be a predator However the lecturer provides the evidence in favour of the idea that the stated mammal could have been a successful hunter 70
- Do you prefer traditional style classes or pre recorded classes 87
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003 78
- The pie charts provide information on how money was spent by an American average household in 1970 and in 2004 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en. Therefore, I agree with that idea. Clearly, old friends and old wine are be...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w relationship with unfamiliar people. Indeed, people should invest time and ef...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and disadvantages of my immigration. Nevertheless, equally important to creat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld become a friendship in the future. In the final analysis, it appears that i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15789473684 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8639391381 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507177033493 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8259044152 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.473684211 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405569820632 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154972833505 0.076458572812 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109600627321 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27893936269 0.150856017488 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109497550196 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.