The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005.
The line graph given compares the percentage of UK citizens who owned different numbers of cars over the course of 30 years, commencing in 1975.
As can be seen from the graph, the proportion of people having two or three cars experienced an upward trend, whereas a significant decline was seen in those who did not any car. Additionally, individuals having only one car registered the highest figure over the examined period.
In 1975, 45% of the UK population had one car while people with no car took up a smaller percentage, at roughly 43%. In the next of 10 years, there was a gradual fall in the percentage o people owning one car to around 39%, followed by a steady growth to 45% in 2005. At the same period, the figure for people with no car experienced a dramatic drop to 22%.
The people having two cars accounted for 5% in 1975. This figure continued to climb to almost 15% at the end of the examined period. Similarly, a similar trend was seen in the people with three cars rate, which rose from under 5% to nearly 10% in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | chau hoang | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Raspreet | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | Wulan | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | Manjinder_kaur | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-24 | nguyen thanh sang | 67 | view |
- The table below gives information about values NZ of the exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 67
- The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year 78
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impacts of ageing populations 56
- The graph below shows information about the consumption of different types of fast food per person per week in England between 1980 and 2000 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49214659686 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49480697458 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570680628272 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7930481893 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193627513871 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880085033735 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047442809322 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126387406698 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018304911345 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.