The graph below shows information about the consumption of different types of fast food per person per week in England between 1980 and 2000.
The line graph illustrates the shifts in how various types of fast food, namely hamburger, fish & chips and pizza was weekly consumed per capita in the U.K within a timespan of 20 years, commencing in 1970.
As can be inferred from the graph, consumption of Hamburger and Fish & Chips overall experienced an upward trend, whereas a gradual decline was seen in that of Pizza. Another key feature is that Fish & Chips is the one that registered the highest consumption figure out of three examined fast food types at the end of the studied period.
In 1970, each English person consumed approximately 40 grams of Hamburger per week. This figure rose significantly to nearly 300 grams by the end of the period. A similar upward trend was witnessed in the weekly consumption of Fish & Chips of each person in the U.K, with its figure surging from shy of 100 grams in 1970 to 500 grams by the last year.
A downward trend was recorded in how many grams of Pizza a citizen in England consumed weekly. To be specific, in 1970, 300 grams was the weekly consumption figure per capita in this country. This number declined progressively to slightly above 200 grams by 1990, a decrease of nearly 100 grams over 20 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...was weekly consumed per capita in the U.K within a timespan of 20 years, commenci...
^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...of Fish & Chips of each person in the U.K, with its figure surging from shy of 10...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72641509434 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58049010535 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533018867925 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0589333695 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18365913439 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850682445191 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661305978328 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124663548147 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401619580845 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.